Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics Advance Access published online on May 29, 2008
Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, doi:10.1093/bfgp/eln023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The untiring search for the most complete proteome representation: reviewing the methods
Corresponding author. Daniel Martins de Souza, Laboratório de Proteômica, Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Biologia, UNICAMP - Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil. Tel/Fax: 55-19-35216654, E-mail: java99{at}unicamp.br
Proteomic research has proved valuable for understanding the molecular mechanisms of biological processes, as well as in the search for biomarkers for a variety of diseases which lack a molecular diagnostic. While several new approaches are being developed, two-dimensional (2-DE) gel electrophoresis is still one of the most commonly used techniques, despite its many limitations. However, for biomarker research, 2-DE gel electrophoresis alone does not fulfill the necessary pre-requisites. If such a technique is utilized exclusively, a great part of a given proteome remains unseen. Therefore, very precise and sensitive techniques are needed. Here, we present a brief review of known methodologies that try to overcome the limitations of conventional proteome analysis as well as their respective advantages and limitations.
Keywords: two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, 2D, 2DE, 2-DE, proteome, proteomics, shotgun, narrow-range, NEPHGE, pre-fractionation, HPLC, depletion, DIGE, protein arrays, low-expressed proteins, high-expressed proteins