Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics Advance Access published online on May 10, 2006
Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, doi:10.1093/bfgp/ell018
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Shotgun proteomic methods involving isobaric tagging of peptides enable high-throughput proteomic analysis. iTRAQ reagents allow simultaneous identification and quantitation of proteins in four different samples using tandem mass spectrometry (MS). In this article, we provide a brief description of proteome analysis using iTRAQ reagents and review the current applications of these reagents in proteomic studies. We also compare different aspects of protein identification including protein sequence coverage and proteome coverage obtained using iTRAQ reagents with those using other shotgun proteomic techniques. We briefly discuss the issue of isotope purity correction in measured peak areas during protein quantitation using iTRAQ reagents. Finally, we conclude with some of the current challenges in MS-based proteomic analysis that are limiting protein identifications obtained by different shotgun proteomic methods. Kunal Aggarwal is a graduate student in the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, NY, USA. Leila H. Choe is a Research Support Specialist in the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, NY, USA. Kelvin H. Lee is Associate Professor in the School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University and is the Director of the Cornell Institute for Biotechnology and Life Science Technologies, NY, USA.
Original Article
Shotgun proteomics using the iTRAQ isobaric tags
Kunal Aggarwal,
Leila H. Choe,
and
Kelvin H. Lee *
Kelvin H. Lee, E-mail: KHL9{at}cornell.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Liu, B. K. Law, and H. Luesch Apratoxin A Reversibly Inhibits the Secretory Pathway by Preventing Cotranslational Translocation Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2009; 76(1): 91 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Mirza and M. Olivier Methods and approaches for the comprehensive characterization and quantification of cellular proteomes using mass spectrometry Physiol Genomics, October 8, 2008; 33(1): 3 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Lehrbach and E. A. Miska Functional genomic, computational and proteomic analysis of C. elegans microRNAs Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, June 19, 2008; (2008) eln024v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-J. M. Webb-Robertson and W. R. Cannon Current trends in computational inference from mass spectrometry-based proteomics Brief Bioinform, September 1, 2007; 8(5): 304 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Radosevich, T. A. Reinhardt, J. D. Lippolis, J. P. Bannantine, and J. R. Stabel Proteome and Differential Expression Analysis of Membrane and Cytosolic Proteins from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Strains K-10 and 187 J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2007; 189(3): 1109 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




