Skip Navigation


Briefings in Functional Genomics Advance Access originally published online on April 16, 2008
Briefings in Functional Genomics 2008 7(3):195-204; doi:10.1093/bfgp/eln016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/3/195    most recent
eln016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moerman, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Barstead, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moerman, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Barstead, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics issue: Special Issue: Caenorhabditis elegans: Ten Years After the Genome [View the issue table of contents]

Special Issue Papers

Towards a mutation in every gene in Caenorhabditis elegans

Donald G. Moerman and Robert J. Barstead

Corresponding author. Donald G. Moerman, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Life Sciences Centre, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver B.C. V6T 1Z3 Canada. E-mail: moerman{at}zoology.ubc.ca

The combined efforts of the Caenorhabditis elegans Knockout Consortium and individuals within the worm community are moving us closer to the goal of identifying mutations in every gene in the nematode C. elegans. At present, we count about 7000 deletion alleles that fall within 5500 genes. The principal method used to detect deletion mutations in the nematode utilizes polymerase chain reaction (PCR). More recently, the Moerman group has incorporated array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) to detect deletions across the entire coding genome. Other methods used to detect mutant alleles in C. elegans include targeting induced local lesion in genomes (TILLING), transposon tagging, using either Tc1 or Mos1 and resequencing. These combined strategies have improved the overall throughput of the gene-knockout labs, and have broadened the types of mutations that we, and others, can identify. In this review, we will discuss these different approaches.

Keywords: C. elegans, mutations, transposon tagging, array comparative genome hybridization, resequencing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeneticsHome page
B. J. Kemp, D. L. Church, J. Hatzold, B. Conradt, and E. J. Lambie
gem-1 Encodes an SLC16 Monocarboxylate Transporter-Related Protein That Functions in Parallel to the gon-2 TRPM Channel During Gonad Development in Caenorhabditis elegans
Genetics, February 1, 2009; 181(2): 581 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.