Skip Navigation

Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics 2006 5(4):289-301; doi:10.1093/bfgp/ell036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heintzmann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ficz, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heintzmann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ficz, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2006, All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Breaking the resolution limit in light microscopy

Rainer Heintzmann and Gabriella Ficz

Corresponding author. Rainer Heintzmann, Tel: +44 20 7848 6519; E-mail: Rainer.Heintzmann{at}kcl.ac.uk

Fluorescent imaging microscopy has been an essential tool for biologists over many years, especially after the discovery of the green fluorescent protein and the possibility of tagging virtually every protein with it. In recent years dramatic enhancement of the level of detail at which a fluorescing structure of interest can be imaged have been achieved. We review classical and new developments in high-resolution microscopy, and describe how these methods have been used in biological research. Classical methods include widefield and confocal microscopy whereas novel approaches range from linear methods such as 4Pi, I5 and structured illumination microscopy to non-linear schemes such as stimulated emission depletion and saturated structured illumination. Localization based approaches (e.g. PALM and STORM), near-field methods and total internal refraction microscopy are also discussed.

As the terms ‘resolution’, ‘sensitivity’, ‘sampling’ and ‘precision’ are sometimes confused, we explain their clear distinction. Key concepts such as the point spread function and the Abbe limit, which are necessary for an in depth understanding of the presented methods, are described without requiring extensive mathematical training.

Keywords: fluorescence microscopy, high resolution, Abbe limit, point spread function, sensitivity, sampling, localization precision, nonlinear microscopy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. Schermelleh, P. M. Carlton, S. Haase, L. Shao, L. Winoto, P. Kner, B. Burke, M. C. Cardoso, D. A. Agard, M. G. L. Gustafsson, et al.
Subdiffraction Multicolor Imaging of the Nuclear Periphery with 3D Structured Illumination Microscopy
Science, June 6, 2008; 320(5881): 1332 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.